A Plea for Proportion
by
Bob Hostetler
Last month, in response to an act of war (invasion of sovereign Israeli
territory and kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers), the democratically-elected
government of Israel
launched attacks against the terrorist organization, Hezbollah, and their
Lebanese strongholds. From the first days of that conflict, many voices
decried the “disproportionate” nature of Israel’s
response (U.N. secretary-general Kofi Annan among them).
Though no one specified what a more proportionate response to
Hezbollah’s illegal actions might be, one can surmise that the pleas
for more proportion would include the following:
1. Israel must strip their military of uniforms
and markings that clearly indicate their combatant status, and wear
civilian clothes, in violation of all Geneva
accords, as Hezbollah does. In fact, Israel
should henceforth violate every Geneva convention.
That would be more proportionate.
2. Israel must move their civilian population back
into harm’s way. After all, one reason Israeli missiles have
resulted in so many more casualties than the Hezbollah rockets is that
Israel—as a responsible, humane government—evacuated 300,000
helpless people from those areas most vulnerable to attack (a refugee
situation the world community has ignored). A more proportionate action would
be to move civilians—especially women and children, for maximum
propaganda effect—back into harm’s way.
3. Israel must launch their attacks from civilian
areas. Hezbollah (and the Lebanese government) has not only largely
failed to evacuate civilian populations, they have
used those civilians as human shields, launching their thousands of missiles
from civilian locations. This presents a win-win scenario for Hezbollah;
either Israel
cannot fight back because of the danger to civilians, or their
counter-attacks will supply Hezbollah with great propaganda for repeated use
on BBC, CNN, and the AP. In order to be more proportionate, Israel
must do the same, no matter how many innocent lives it will cost.
4. Israel must actively target civilians on the
other side. Israel
has been using precision-guided weapons to minimize civilian casualties;
Hezbollah, of course, targets civilian areas (including residences, schools,
and hospitals) with unguided rockets armed with ball bearings and other items
designed to maximize the carnage. For Israel
to do the same would be far more proportionate.
5. Israel must not regret, investigate, or
apologize for civilian deaths on the other side. Israeli has expressed
regret for civilian casualties, emphasizing the impossibility of responding
to Hezbollah’s tactics without such results. Hezbollah, on the other
hand, celebrates the Israeli civilians they manage to kill or maim. A more
proportionate response would be for Israel
to do the same.
6. Israel must show no restraint. So far in this conflict, Israel
has taken measured steps to achieve specific ends. The Israeli military
clearly has far more destructive capacity than they have so far used.
Hezbollah, on the other hand, is throwing their best weapons at Israel’s
civilians as fast as they can. In other words, no one doubts that Hezbollah
is going all-out; in order to be proportionate, Israel
(a nuclear power) would have to do the same.
7. Israel must publicly call for the destruction
of Hezbollah and occupation of Lebanon. Hezbollah proudly articulates their
goal in this and every conflict: the destruction of Israel.
Israel has
demanded the return of their kidnapped soldiers, the disarming of Hezbollah
according to United Nations Resolution 1559, and to be left
in peace. That is clearly disproportionate, so Israel
must measure up to the standards of Hezbollah (which the world community
seems to like so well).
8. Israel must fire their democratically-elected
government and operate without accountability. Israel
is a representative democracy, with numerous political parties that engage in
open (endless, actually) debate and demand constant accountability. Hezbollah
is a terrorist organization, funded by Syria
and Iran,
operating within the boundaries of a supposedly sovereign nation, Lebanon.
In order to be more proportionate in this conflict, Israel
must transform itself into a freelance thugocracy
that utterly ignores international borders.
If Israel
can do those things, then we may expect the international
community—including the United Nations—to be pleased at the
specter of a more proportionate war.
Of course, reasonable people everywhere expect nothing of the kind. Nor do
they wish anything of the kind. But that won’t
stop the calls for more proportion, unless someone stops to think about what
that would mean.
This article appeared
in the August 6, 2006,
edition of the Hamilton Journal-News.
More articles by
Bob Hostetler...
Copyright © 2006, Bob
Hostetler
|